Jim Jackson previews the NBA draft
April 9th, 2008 . by UncleLarDownloadJackson gives his assessment of Eric Gordon et al.
DownloadJackson gives his assessment of Eric Gordon et al.

My prediction juggernaut rolled on with a perfect Elite eight:
Memphis has improved their power rankings to almost draw dead even with UCLA. I have the Bruins as a slight favorite over Memphis.
Game Predictions
![]()
I’m absolutely thrilled the way the predictions have gone so far.
I’m looking forward to seeing how the Sweet Sixteen play out.
Here are the picks:
| Sweet Sixteen | ||||
| North Carolina | 71 | Washington St. | 69 | W |
| Louisville | 69 | Tennessee | 67 | W |
| Kansas | 77 | Villanova | 62 | W |
| Wisconsin | 68 | Davidson | 59 | L |
| Memphis | 68 | Michigan St. | 64 | W |
| Stanford | 66.7 | Texas | 67.0 | W |
| UCLA | 73 | Western Kentucky | 59 | W |
| Xavier | 67.0 | West Virginia | 66.6 | W |
The first round saw me finish a highly respectable 26-6 (and atop my pool). Here are the latest predictions for the second round.
The power ranking adjustments do call for one change from my previous predictions. I now have Stanford defeating Marquette.
| Round of 32 | ||||
| North Carolina | 78 | Arkansas | 70 | W |
| Notre Dame | 66 | Washington St. | 69 | W |
| Oklahoma | 59 | Louisville | 65 | W |
| Butler | 68 | Tennessee | 71 | W |
| Kansas | 76 | Nevada Las Vegas | 60 | W |
| Villanova | 71 | Siena | 65 | W |
| Kansas St. | 62 | Wisconsin | 66 | W |
| Davidson | 62 | Georgetown | 68 | L |
| Memphis | 69 | Mississippi St. | 60 | W |
| Michigan St. | 69 | Pittsburgh | 68 | W |
| Marquette | 64 | Stanford | 65 | W |
| Miami FL | 66 | Texas | 74 | W |
| UCLA | 66 | Texas A&M | 59 | W |
| Western Kentucky | 67 | San Diego St. | 64 | W |
| Purdue | 65 | Xavier | 66 | W |
| West Virginia | 68 | Duke | 71 | L |
Now that Penn State’s season is over and the NCAA’s are hear, I thought I’d have a little fun with my power rankings (or maybe I should say Ken Pomeroy’s since my ratings are lock step in sync with his).
I’ve been predicting game scores all year long but have never actually compared them to the Vegas odds. I’m going to try a little experiment with the tournament. I’m going to compare my predicted spread with the Vegas spread. If my number differs from the Vegas number by three or more points, I’ll list the game. Anything less than three I’ll just stay away from.
Here are the games that fit that bill for the first round (in declining order of confidence). I list the game with the Vegas line, then my pick with the difference between my line and the Vegas line in parenthesis so you get a feel for the level of confidence.
This should give me a little more incentive to pay attention as I watch the games.